There's a J. Crew ad that's been causing some nontroversy of late - a photo of J. Crew's creative director with her preschool-aged son, whose tiny toenails are painted neon pink:
Well, the usual suspects have been up in arms over this. She's ruining him! She'll turn him gay! By the feminizing power of pink and nail polish, she's gender-confusing him! Blah blah etc. The gay agenda is at work here, whatever.
And then there's the recent, and growing, pushback from the self-proclaimed morality police against anti-bullying programs that try to teach kids not to beat up gay/trans/perceived-non-gender-conforming kids. Gay agenda! Indoctrination! Brainwashing! Alarmist nonsense!
I also distinctly remember a hue and cry when some same-gender couples in California brought their kids to anti-Prop H8 protests. It was "shameful" that us pervs would "use our children this way". No links, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers it.
So why are the bigots, who are so keen to label participation of young'uns in pro-gay and pro-equality movements as this horrible brainwashing abuse we're perpetuating on the innocent behbehs, okay with things like Peter LaBarbera's Youth Hate Camp? And why has there been no terrible outcry against these fucknuggets, who have filed about 50 lawsuits against various school districts across Ohio, Kentucky, Florida, and other southern states, for banning t-shirts saying things like "God Hates Whores." and "God Hates Muslims Gays.", when they made their daughter wear those shirts to school? That's a couple who is outright using their daughter to push their hateful right-wing agenda by making her wear controversial slogans and face punishment from her school administrators in order to give them cause to start another lawsuit. I eagerly await the disavowal and condemnation from Faux News and One Million Moms, over this shameful example of brainwashing and exploitation of a child for a degenerate cause.
Yeah. That's what I thought.