So I decided on a whim to see what their grocery lists would actually cost if I tried to live by them. I wrote down what all was on these lists, and today I went to the store and pretend-shopped for all of it.
For context: I live in a smallish town on the outskirts of the Bay Area, California. This is widely (and correctly) regarded as a really fucking expensive place to live. The particular town I live in is a middle-to-upper-middle-class old-white-people town that sits cheek-to-jowl beside one of the poorest primarily-PoC towns in the area. I don't shop at expensive grocery stores, however. This is not Whole Foods or something. I do my grocery shopping at Raley's, which is a midrange grocery chain common in this region. (I might have done this experiment at the Safeway that's also nearby, as Safeway is generally considered to be the more bargain grocery store, but I have found over time that I spend about the same at both for the same amount of food, and often actually save better at Raley's, so. Also I know the Raley's better and it would have taken me much longer to do this at Safeway. What? My time is valuable, y'all.) So we are looking at prices at a mid-range grocery store in a middle-class area of a region that has a very high cost of living. These grocery lists may actually cost closer to what the graphics quote them at in other regions - they feel less inaccurate to me when I consider what that would have cost when I was living and buying groceries in Tennessee, although I still think they're vastly underpricing the meat and produce.
With all that said, here are the comparisons; in the lists, their price is listed first, with my price following in parentheses; when my price includes a range, it encompasses the cheapest store-brand price or sale price, up to the brand name or non-sale price:
Image 1: Four Burger King Whopper meals ($21.76) versus this grocery list:
- 1 box Morningstar Farms meatless burgers, $2.98 ($5.29)
- 1 lb 96% lean ground beef, $2.98 ($5.49)
- 16 oz cashews, $4.18 ($7.99-11.96)
- 1 lb strawberries, $1.67 ($2.50-4.99)
- 10 lbs potatoes, $2.97 ($5)
- 1 gallon 100% orange juice, $3.26 ($3.88)
- 1 lb bag frozen vegetables mix, $0.98 ($2.00)
- 1 bunch broccoli, $1.58 ($1.99)
- 1 lb bag dry pinto beans, $1.08 ($1.69)
Image 2: A large pepperoni pizza from Domino's with an order of breadsticks ($19.98) versus this grocery list:
- 1.25 lbs sweet Italian turkey sausage, $3.82 ($5.49)
- 1 lb frozen tilapia filets, $3.98 ($4.99)
- 1 lb 93% lean ground turkey, $1.98 ($3.98-5.49)
- 1 16-oz jar Smucker's Natural Peanut Butter, $2.38 ($3.89)
- 1 box (40 bags) green tea, $2.58 ($3.79)
- 1 lb bag dry lentils, $0.94 ($1.59)
- 1 box Kashi Heart to Heart crackers, $2.98 ($2.99-3.79)
Image 3: An 8-piece KFC fried chicken meal bucket, with four biscuits and two sides ($19.61) versus this grocery list:
- 2 lbs chicken breasts (fresh, not frozen), $1.96 ($6.49-9)
- 10 lbs potatoes, $2.97 ($5)
- 8 ears of corn, $2.00 ($4-12)
- 1 lb of peaches, $0.98 ($2.99)
- 1 gallon skim milk, $2.00 ($2.79-3.29)
- 1 lb 96% lean ground beef, $2.98 ($5.49)
- 32 oz tub Yoplait fat-free yogurt, $2.27 ($3.59)
- 18 oz rolled oats, $1.18 ($1.98)
- 2 lbs frozen sweet peas, $1.98 ($5)
- 1 lb dry kidney beans, $1.22 ($1.99)
Image 4: A box of TGI Friday's jalapeno poppers and a bag of breaded cheese sticks ($10.76), versus the following grocery list:
- 1 box Morningstar meatless burgers, $2.98 ($5.29)
- 1 lb dry pinto beans, $1.08 ($1.69)
- 1 lb dry kidney beans, $1.22 ($1.99)
- 1 lb brown rice, $0.72 ($1.35
- 2 cans Hunt's no-salt diced tomatoes, $1.84 ($3.90)
- 18 oz jar Jif Natural Peanut Butter, $2.18 ($3.89)
- 4 ears of corn, $1 ($2-6)
Image 5: A box of Delimex frozen chicken taquitos ($6.87), versus the following grocery list:
- 1 loaf Brownberry (Oroweat) 100% whole wheat bread, $2.50 ($3-4.99)
- 1 lb chicken breasts, $0.98 ($6.49)
- 1 lb baby carrots, $1.44 ($1.58)
- 1 lb bananas, $0.47 ($0.68)
- 4 ears of corn, $1 ($2-6)
Image 6: A bag of Ore-Ida brand "golden crinkle" frozen french fries ($5.44), versus the following grocery list:
- 1 lb frozen mixed vegetables, $0.98 ($2)
- 10 lbs potatoes, $2.97 ($5)
- 1 lb bananas, $0.47 ($0.68)
- 1 box whole-wheat spaghetti, $0.88 ($1.69)
Image 7: A 1-lb bag of Twizzlers ($1.68) versus a 6-oz bag of dried cranberries ($1.68). I found the Twizzlers for $2.69, and the dried cranberries were either $2.59 for a 5-oz package of Ocean Spray, or $2.87 for a 6-oz bag of store-brand. So they were still pretty close to equivalent, although I'll point out that you're getting less than half the total amount of product for the same price if you go with the "healthy" equivalent (which speaks to the sad state of food politics in this country), so if you're looking to get a tasty snack that will last you the whole week without running out, fuck it, Twizzlers it is.
Conclusion: Their price comparisons may be accurate, if you are shopping at Walmart for all your groceries (Great Value is Walmart's store brand), and if all produce is magically always in season, and if you live in a region where the cost of living is this low. But when you have to tack that many conditions on to make your admonition, which is addressed to the general public without any of these qualifiers, halfway believable, maybe you shouldn't be trying to generalize quite that far.
This is especially true when you're making a comparison between the price of fast food, which remains relatively constant across regions (those prices for BK and KFC ring pretty true to what I'd be paying if I bought the same stuff - maybe a few dollars cheaper, but not much), to the price of grocery store food, which is much more variable. Under one particular set of circumstances, buying the listed groceries might actually be cheaper than buying the listed fast food meals. But what about everyone else? And it's in especially poor taste to chirp "No excuses!" when you put these images on your blog, without taking into account the variation in human circumstance that may make this completely implausible for a huge chunk of your audience.
And then there are all the other criticisms to be made of this approach...
1: There are no cooking necessities included in these lists. Not at all. No butter, no oils, no spices, no vinegars, no cornstarch or dressings or heavy cream or flour or any of the things people use to make raw food taste *good* when it's done cooking. Even if someone does shop off these lists, unless your kitchen is pre-stocked with accessories (which are fucking expensive to get started with, those little bottles of spices are at least $5 a pop, which adds up fast when you want a basic variety of things like garlic powder, onion powder, italian seasoning, thyme, rosemary, seasoned salt, etc.), anything you make from these ingredients is going to taste like shit because you had no way of adding flavor to them or enhancing their natural flavor.
2: Can we talk about how much more time and effort is involved in cooking? Especially when you're talking about things like dry beans and lentils and raw whole potatoes! Beans and lentils have to be soaked, often overnight, and then cooked for hours on end to make them soft enough to eat. Potatoes have to be washed, peeled, cut up, boiled, and then mashed (for mashed potatoes), washed and cut up and coated with spices and oil and roasted (for roasted, and the kind of bulk potatoes you can get cheaply don't really turn out well that way), or put in the oven for like a fucking hour to make baked potatoes. Take those frozen crinkle fries, for example - they are the same price or less than a big-ass bag of potatoes, and you can pop them in the oven for fifteen minutes and have hot food ready to eat, where raw potatoes will take you *at least* half an hour to render suitable for consumption - and that's half an hour of actively working on them, peeling and cutting and such, while the fries you can just spread on a cookie sheet and pop in the oven to bake while you work on making your main dish. If you are a person with a busy life - like, say, someone who works multiple jobs or has children to care for or both, and who would be the kind of person who would need to shop most cheaply in the first place - time and effort are major factors in what kinds of food are viable for you. Sometimes you just need to throw food at your family and fall into bed, which is a situation which does not lend itself to peeling potatoes and soaking beans and cutting up chicken (and then doing all the resulting dishes, which I've always found to be the more time-consuming, exhausting, and annoying part of "real" cooking).
3: Produce goes bad quickly. If you use a lot of produce in your cooking, you will need to go to the store several times a week to get fresh stuff. If you work multiple jobs, or have to take public transit to go shopping, for example, that would be a gigantic pain in the ass and frankly not worth it when combined with the amount of extra effort raw ingredients require before being able to eat.
4: I want to know on what planet the maker of these graphics is buying their meat. Because I have NEVER, not even on the best sales in the cheapest area I've ever lived, seen fresh chicken breasts for under a dollar a pound. Thighs, maybe. Not breasts.
5: What about people with food aversions? Either for sensory reasons (many autistic people, for example, have strong sensory aversions to certain foods, to the point where trying to eat or even handle them will make them throw up) or simply because a certain food tastes gross to you. Bananas make several appearances here, because they're reliably the cheapest fruit you can get, and they're reasonably good for you. However, I hate bananas with a flaming passion. I bought some this week, actually, because Ozz has been having muscle cramps and bananas are high in potassium, which helps with that. I forced myself to eat one on the logic that I could probably use the vitamins too, and the other three of the bunch of four are turning brown on my counter as I type this, because neither of us likes them. Peppers and onions often appear on "healthy on a budget" types of grocery/meal lists, because they're very flavorful and can be used to impart that flavor into a wide variety of dishes. Problem being, I can't eat anything that's got peppers in it, because the taste disgusts me so badly. I would never buy baby carrots or nuts if I were trying to stock my mom's house with snacks, because she's allergic.
People are different, is what I'm trying to say here, and many "cheap and healthy" foods are not an option for a lot of people. Finger-wagging graphics pitting "good" food choices versus "bad" food choices are ridiculous for about eight billion reasons, but they all pretty much begin and end with "You have completely failed to take into account the lived realities of people who are not you."
Of course, this is not something the makers of these graphics want to consider, because having to consider the actual facts would mean that there is no pithy oversimplification that looks good on a poster that they can use to shame people into doing what they think is Right and Good. And where would the diet/food-policing industry be without their pithy oversimplifications?*
*In the dust bin of history where they belong, that's where, and good riddance.
26 comments:
Re: your number 4 point about the
I was thinking of doing this very same thing after seeing that collection of all the food shaming graphics together. If I get the chance I might go ahead and do it to give an East Coast (south east Georgia) comparison to your numbers. I live in what is generally considered a relatively low cost of living, but I have a feeling that my numbers might not be too far off from what you found.
More data is always better. For SCIENCE!
Ooh, I would like to see that! (I'd be happy to send you the spreadsheet I used to make the calculations/comparisons easier, if you decide you want to do it.)
*standing ovation*
Well then, as soon as someone invents a time machine, we're good to go! ;-)
(Which explains why I've never seen it as that's before I was ever doing my own shopping...)
*bows with a flourish* Thank you. I do try. Well, more accurately, I get fed up and set out to prove my point rather exhaustively. Six of one, half a dozen of the other, right?
Could maybe get some around the country price points using one of the various shop from home sites that some of the grocery stores have in some parts of the country. When I've compared the online prices to going to that same store, the prices were the same. Not all areas have it, but plug in some random zip codes and you can probably price check in several different broad regions.
I have a hunch that it'll be pretty uniformly more expensive however... and like Jadelyn found, a lot of the "bad" choices are going to be inflated prices also.
That's a good idea. This may turn into quite the project...
Goddamn, I can't even find thighs for less than $1/lb, and I live in Texas, with fairly low cost of living. Also, if I could 10 lbs of potatoes for less than $3, I would probably do a happy dance.
Well done! So nice to hear someone else loathes peppers and all their horrible derivatives. I've always said they smell to me like garbage water, that appalling liquid that tends to gather at the bottom of a kitchen garbage bag left to sit too long. I can't fathom why anyone would eat them, as I think they're completely disgusting.
So yeah, high five for the She-Woman Pepper Haters Club!
She-Woman Pepper Haters 4 life! I try them again every now and then - because damnit, everybody else likes them, and I know they're good for me, so I keep trying, and every time it's just like...ew, no, now I remember why I don't do this. I find a weird sour-bitterness to them, whether raw or cooked, and I just can't do it.
That's ok you two. I'll take all your peppers! nomnomnom!
And I will share them (the bell/sweet ones anyway) with my guinea pig Itty Bit. And my other guinea pig Kibble shall join you in your pepper hating corner and stare at us pepper eaters in disbelief :D
It is (I am told) possible to get chicken around that cheap if you know what time of day and week your grocer restocks, and if you have a grocer that puts the older stuff on discount to clear it out at that time, and if you are able to go shopping at that time, and if they have a surplus at that time to clear out.
I say "I am told" because I do not meet all these conditions, and I suspect most people who will be on the receiving end of such lectures also do not.
You know, I hadn't considered that. But you're right, and I would venture that most people in general don't meet those conditions, or at best there will be some weeks that they do and some weeks that they don't, which makes using that kind of price as a baseline for calculations pretty ridiculous.
Also, you're not cooking a damn thing if your utilities have been cut off.
That too. Plus all that produce and meat is now spoiled and now not only do you not have food, you have wasted precious resources on stuff you didn't get to eat.
Yup. I actually do end up doing a lot of grocery purchasing of this type because: a) I'm privileged to be able to handle prep and cleanup most of the time; b) I enjoy cooking, and fresh produce is my especial preference; c) I have GI issues that render most fast food, erm, super slippery to my insides. But when talking about groceries with local friends (most of whom are in similar two-person-cohabiting arrangements to mine), they're always like, "How is your grocery bill so high! Where are you shopping?"
I've comparison shopped and found that it's what, not where, I am buying. "Real food" (a term I hate; McDoubles are not imaginary!) still costs real money.
I like your point about "real food" as a misnomer. Does it have calories? Is it digestible? Are you consuming it? It's real food.
I've been able to watch very recently as my household budget made some pretty big shifts, downward and then back up. And the quality of food we have during each phase is pretty drastically different. On a tight budget, our staples were ramen, eggs, instant mashed potatoes, and rice. Our diet didn't really get a lot of variety. Carbs were the mainstay. Now, when money is a little bit less desperately not there? I can actually plan menus. Buy red meat. Make meals that include multiple dishes. It's a world of difference - and we're spending about twice as much for the privilege of it. More, some weeks. And that's without much produce involved and with still fairly heavy reliance on "convenience" foods - frozen stuff, instant mashed potatoes again, that sort of thing - because I don't always have the energy to do the work entirely-from-scratch dishes require. If we were to start making more complicated dishes with greater numbers of fresh ingredients...I could easily see our grocery bills increasing another 50%.
All of this makes me wonder if the Grocery Police actually do their own shopping. You'd think they'd notice the correlation between their grocery bills and the freshness and quality of their food...
Good research!
Don't discount lentils though--they only take 20-30 minutes to cook. My go-to family cheap I'm-too-tired-to-cook recipe was half a pound of lentils ($1.29-$1.69/lb. - sometimes cheaper in the Mexican section) with a package of sausage for flavor ($5.49 -$6.99 -- Aidells or other fully-cooked brand). Add water to cover. Simmer until the lentils are as soft as you like. On those rare times I was feeling ambitious, I'd throw in vegetables--carrots, onion, celery, spinach. Serves approximately 6. I was a bell pepper hater until I discovered that the green ones just aren't ripe yet. Red bell peppers are one of my favorite foods.
That doesn't sound half bad. I might give that a try in fact. (The lentils, not the peppers. :-P ) I had sort of had the impression that lentils were pretty much the same as beans, cooking-wise. Good to know they're not. (Of course, literally the only time that I know of that I've had lentils was a dried lentil soup mix while backpacking. So I'm not really the person to ask about them.)
I've seen these go around sometimes, and I'm pretty sure that their "good" food prices are coming from a) Wal-Mart b) in Texas, which has a much lower cost of living than many other areas, including gasoline ($3.69/gal right now) and groceries.
I live in Austin and don't buy the cheapest available food or go to the cheapest possible store, but I only spend $20-25 on groceries most weeks. So I think that's where their data is coming from.
That sounds about right. Like I said, it seems more accurate when I compare it to my memory of prices when I lived in TN. But my point still stands, that it's not fair or accurate to take the prices in the cheapest store in the cheapest cost-of-living region of the country, and post them like it's generally applicable without any disclaimer, while pretty much encouraging people to use it as a "see, there's no excuse for not eating healthy!" shaming tool.
Also I'm srsly jealous of your grocery bill! Unless I want to live on ramen and rice, I pretty much *can't* spend less than $50 a week for two people. Usually $75-100, especially if a staple (like the big bag of rice, or the jar of minced garlic that I use for everything, or toilet paper or paper towels or something) needs restocked.
According to the great and powerful wiki, the same ice cream is sold as Dreyer's in the western US and Edy's in the eastern US. The different names allow each of the founders to have a brand, and they did that to avoid being confused with Breyer's in the eastern US (Breyer's apparently had not expanded to the western US when they did that).
Edy's! That's the one. I remember it now. Thank you! And thank you for the explanation as well.
I live in Canada; I have never seen prices as seen in those ads, especially after taxes.
I am autistic too, have food sensitivities and intolerances. Like, I would NEVER buy lentils, or kidney beans. just, ew!!! actually, lentils are part of my intolerance diet, can't eat it cause it gives me indigestion, same with chickpeas, soy and more than a handful of nuts. And if something triggers my sensory no-no, instant gag reflex and there's no way I'm eating it.
I consume most of my veggies in dishes, either as sandwiches (yay, I almost finished a small tub of baby spinach in my lunches!!) or inside main course dishes, like soup or cooked with meat or rice. I can never eat veggies alone, unless in a damn good salad with dressing.
But yes, I concur. Those ads are such disgusting shaming tactics towards people who most likely are more concerned with being able to eat at all!! For all the reasons above, and also with what one can store. I live in a shared house; I get one set of the cupboards and half a fridge to store foodstuffs. When the house was crowded, there was three people in a fridge, and I only got one shelf of the fridge. Not enough room to store a lot of food, especially if I wanted to make a big pot of something to have over the week that I just needed to reheat.
So there are a lot of factors that the makers of those ads are painfully ignorant in: storage space, ability/energy to prepare food, transportation, dietary restrictions (sensory, allergy, GI issues), and the actual prices of food.
Oh, hell, I had completely forgotten to consider the realities of shared housing and food storage! It's been a long time since I've been in shared housing other than with family or my partner, but I remember it well enough. And that's not even counting light-fingered roommates. There was a year in college where anything important got well-sealed-up and stored in the trunk of my car, because one of my roommates would eat other people's food all the time, and would get scary-angry if asked to stop.
Post a Comment